WebTalk – with Cap Anamur managing director Bernd Göken

Cap Anamur Managing Director Bernd Göken gave a keynote speech on 28.11. on the subject of “Civil Society Engagement in a Crisis Country” as part of the Web Talk “(K)eine Chance für Afghanistan” of the Friedrich Naumann Foundation.

The Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom dealt with the current peace process and political developments in Afghanistan within the framework of the Web Talk “(K)eine Chance für Afghanistan”. In addition to Dr. Marie-Agnes Strack Zimmermann, FDB Member of the Bundestag and spokesperson for defence policy and local politics of the FDP faction, Bernd Göken, Managing Director of Cap Anamur / Deutsche Notärzte e.V. was invited as speaker.

Bernd Göken presented in his keynote speech “Civil society involvement in a crisis country” the work of Cap Anamur in Afghanistan since 2001. He explains which measures have been implemented in the medical and educational sector and how humanitarian aid has changed there over the last 20 years. The work of the Cologne-based aid organization has always had to adapt to the tensed political situation.

Here you can watch the WebTalk and the keynote:

YouTube

Mit dem Laden des Videos akzeptieren Sie die Datenschutzerklärung von YouTube.
Mehr erfahren

Video laden

An opportunity for Afghanistan? – Peace process and development of Afghanistan put to the test

“Is Afghanistan at a crossroads? After the United States of America concluded an agreement with the Taliban at the end of February 2020, the signs are pointing to withdrawal for the Americans. According to the agreement, all U.S. soldiers, allies, and civilian contractors are to be withdrawn by the end of April 2021. The troops have already been reduced. An early withdrawal by Christmas was announced by President Trump. After tenacious preparations, the Afghan government is also negotiating with the Taliban. Will there be a peace agreement in the end, a chance for Afghanistan? What will this peace agreement contain? Women’s rights are not negotiable, explained the Afghan government’s western partners. Moreover, the Taliban 2020 is not the Taliban of 2001, so can the Taliban be involved in the government without a loss of human and civil rights? What mark do they actually want to leave on the country, which has now been at war for over 40 years? How is the almost 20-year-long mission of NATO and its partners to be assessed? Was everything in vain, including the sacrifices made by Bundeswehr soldiers during their deployment there, who returned either dead or seriously wounded in body and/or soul?